AardvarkTravel.net Travel Search Engine & Travel Directory

By participating in these forums you can earn free advertising! Click here for details.

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

     

ENOUGH OF THE TALK: MAN NEVER WENT TO THE MOON!!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Sponsored by:
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AardvarkTravel.net Forum Index -> Space Travel Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
phpesenti
Flight Steward
Flight Steward


Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Location: barcelona
107 ants

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well, for those who don't like to be taken for stupid it does. for those who don't care about abything, it does not obviously
_________________
london luxury hotels |
london cheap hotels | nyc luxury hotels
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
StephanG
Flight Steward
Flight Steward


Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 42
Location: London
43 ants

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's just hard to prove either way.

And it often involves silly arguments. For example, some of the hoax claims that Paul posted a quite shaky, such as:

#1. Its Full of Stars!: Space is littered with little points of lights (stars). Why then are they missing from the photographs?
Because they require different exposures to capture on film.

#5. Death by Meteor: Space is filled with super-fast micro meteors that would punch through the ship and kill the astronauts.
This does happen in space, it's well documented.

#6. Liquid Water on the Moon: To leave a footprint requires moisture in the soil, doesn't it?
Nope.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
phpesenti
Flight Steward
Flight Steward


Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Location: barcelona
107 ants

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

it cannot be possiblle, if we consider the position of shadows, direction of the wind and many more argument to beleive what they want us to believe.
I still don't understand how people cannot open their eyes and try to see, same for 9/11.
who has ever found pieces of the Boeing that crashed on the penthagon? and so many more
_________________
london luxury hotels |
london cheap hotels | nyc luxury hotels
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
paul
Captain
Captain


Joined: 09 Sep 2002
Posts: 14542
Location: UK
18977 ants

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

phpesenti wrote:
...same for 9/11.
who has ever found pieces of the Boeing that crashed on the penthagon? and so many more


http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.asp Rolling Eyes
_________________
UK Hotels - UK Selfcatering - UK B&Bs - UK Attractions
Luxury Travel - Lake District Apartment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
phpesenti
Flight Steward
Flight Steward


Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Location: barcelona
107 ants

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, reopening 9/11 gives you many, really many arguments about this inside job.
Obviously those who want to make us believe it was done by islamists have a lot of money to spend...
I am not trying to convince anyone, facts are talking for themselves.
_________________
london luxury hotels |
london cheap hotels | nyc luxury hotels
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
paul
Captain
Captain


Joined: 09 Sep 2002
Posts: 14542
Location: UK
18977 ants

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did you read the link I posted?

What parts of it - specifically - don't you agree with?
_________________
UK Hotels - UK Selfcatering - UK B&Bs - UK Attractions
Luxury Travel - Lake District Apartment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CarlM
Flight Steward
Flight Steward


Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Posts: 62
Location: Phoenix, AZ
67 ants

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The latest from NASA.

NASA Spacecraft Images Offer Sharper Views of Apollo Landing Sites
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html

The real issue with people who do not believe that astronauts landed on the moon comes down to a lack of understanding of the physics involved when you are operating in a near vacuum at 1/6 the gravity found on Earth.

A flag will appear to waive in a vacuum due to inertia and the lack of atmosphere to dampen the momentum. The flag in the videos did not waive on its own due to wind. It appears to waive only immediately after the astronauts planted it because there was nothing to stop the momentum except the weak 1/6 gravity.

The surface of the moon is very light colored and without an atmosphere to diffuse the light radiation from the sun, the brightness and reflectivity of the surface caused the "anomalies" claimed by the conspiracy theorists. There also is no air temperature because there is no air. There is a surface temperature, but an object has to be exposed to the sun for a long period of time in order to build up a high surface temperature. The cameras used were modified with a silver finish so that they did not absorb solar radiation.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11-hass.html

The brightness and reflectivity of the surface explains the lack of stars in the background in the photos and videos. Anyone who knows about photography can easily explain this because the iris on the camera lenses had to be closed down in order to prevent the surface objects and astronauts from getting washed out due to overexposure. The stars in the background were not bright enough relative to the brightness of the moon's surface and therefore were not captured on film.

The surface of the moon has a consistency of talcum powder. You do not need moisture to create a footprint in powder. Whoever made the claim that you need water to leave a footprint has obviously never tried it.

Space is not filled with micrometeorites. Due to the vastness of space, meteorites and micrometeorites are very rare. Even with the tens of thousands of Earth orbits experienced by the USA, Russians and others, there have been only a few minor incidents where micrometeorites have struck the surfaces of spacecraft and the damage has been very minor. Those spacecraft as well as numerous satellites are still up there during multiple annual meteor showers and have never been damaged.

The same lack of understanding of physics explains most of the conspiracy theories about 9/11. You will also have a difficult time locating most of the officials who the conspirator theorists claim to have seen explosions or have inside information, because they were fabrications created to sell books and DVDs. Those that have been located have denied making those statements. The others never existed.

Facts do speak for themselves, but only when you pay attention to the facts and know how to separate facts from fiction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AardvarkTravel.net Forum Index -> Space Travel Forum All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Google
 
Business ForumSport ForumTravel Forum


Powered by php B B © 2001, 2002 php B B Group

AardvarkTravel.net Travel Search Engine & Directory